↓ Skip to main content

Clomiphene citrate in combination with gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clomiphene citrate in combination with gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008528.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed Gibreel, Abha Maheshwari, Siladitya Bhattacharya

Abstract

Gonadotropins are the most commonly used medication for controlled ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, they are expensive, invasive and are associated with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). With recent calls for patient friendly IVF, there has been an interest in the use of clomiphene citrate with or without gonadotropins to reduce the burden of injections. However, it is not known whether regimens using clomiphene are at least as effective as gonadotropins alone.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 15 29%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,656,890
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,998
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,243
of 254,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#331
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.