↓ Skip to main content

Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003857.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mostafa Metwally, Ying C Cheong, Andrew W Horne

Abstract

Fibroids are the most common benign tumours of the female genital tract and are associated with numerous clinical problems including a possible negative impact on fertility. In women requesting preservation of fertility, fibroids can be surgically removed (myomectomy) by laparotomy, laparoscopically or hysteroscopically depending on the size, site and type of fibroid. Myomectomy is however a procedure that is not without risk and can result in serious complications. It is therefore essential to determine whether such a procedure can result in an improvement in fertility and, if so, to then determine the ideal surgical approach.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 39 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 63%
Unspecified 13 13%
Psychology 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 10 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,565,585
of 13,606,339 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,405
of 10,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,136
of 247,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#331
of 512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,606,339 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.