You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Checklist of mammals from Goiás, central Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biota Neotropica, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2020-1173 |
| Authors |
Wellington Hannibal, Marlon Zortéa, Analice M. Calaça, Ana Paula Carmignotto, Alexandra M. R. Bezerra, Henrique G. Carvalho, Cibele R. Bonvicino, Ana C. M. Martins, Ludmilla M. S. Aguiar, Marcelino B. de Souza, Ingrid de Mattos, Roniel F. Oliveira, Daniel Brito, Diego A. Silva, Marco A. Guimarães, Edwilson M. B. do Carmo, Jânio C. Moreira |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 56% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#76
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,032
of 502,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.