↓ Skip to main content

Harmonized D-dimer levels upon admission for prognosis of COVID-19 severity: Results from a Spanish multicenter registry (BIOCOVID-Spain study)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 926)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Harmonized D-dimer levels upon admission for prognosis of COVID-19 severity: Results from a Spanish multicenter registry (BIOCOVID-Spain study)
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, July 2021
DOI 10.1007/s11239-021-02527-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis García de Guadiana-Romualdo, Daniel Morell-García, Emmanuel J. Favaloro, Juan A. Vílchez, Josep M. Bauça, María J. Alcaide Martín, Irene Gutiérrez Garcia, Patricia de la Hera Cagigal, José Manuel Egea-Caparrós, Sonia Pérez Sanmartín, José I. Gutiérrez Revilla, Eloísa Urrechaga, Jose M. Álamo, Ana M. Hernando Holgado, María-Carmen Lorenzo-Lozano, Magdalena Canalda Campás, María A. Juncos Tobarra, Cristian Morales-Indiano, Isabel Vírseda Chamorro, Yolanda Pastor Murcia, Laura Sahuquillo Frías, Laura Altimira Queral, Elisa Nuez-Zaragoza, Juan Adell Ruiz de León, Alicia Ruiz Ripa, Paloma Salas Gómez-Pablos, Iria Cebreiros López, Amaia Fernández Uriarte, Alex Larruzea, María L. López Yepes, Natalia Sancho-Rodríguez, María C. Zamorano Andrés, José Pedregosa Díaz, Luis Sáenz, Clara Esparza del Valle, María C. Baamonde Calzada, Sara García Muñoz, Marina Vera, Esther Martín Torres, Silvia Sánchez Fdez-Pacheco, Luis Vicente Gutiérrez, Laura Jiménez Añón, Alfonso Pérez Martínez, Aurelio Pons Castillo, Ruth González Tamayo, Jorge Férriz Vivancos, Olaia Rodríguez-Fraga, Vicens Díaz-Brito, Vicente Aguadero, M. G. García Arévalo, María Arnaldos Carrillo, Mercedes González Morales, María Núñez Gárate, Cristina Ruiz Iruela, Patricia Esteban Torrella, Martí Vila Pérez, Cristina Acevedo Alcaraz, Alfonso L. Blázquez-Manzanera, Amparo Galán Ortega

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 63%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,673,927
of 18,866,097 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#49
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,225
of 314,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,866,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.