↓ Skip to main content

Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules

Overview of attention for article published in BONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 4,346)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
32 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules
Published in
BONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Higby Schweitzer, Wenxia Zheng, Timothy P. Cleland, Marshall Bern

Abstract

The discovery of soft, transparent microstructures in dinosaur bone consistent in morphology with osteocytes was controversial. We hypothesize that, if original, these microstructures will have molecular features in common with extant osteocytes. We present immunological and mass spectrometry evidence for preservation of proteins comprising extant osteocytes (Actin, Tubulin, PHEX, Histone H4) in osteocytes recovered from two non-avian dinosaurs. Furthermore, antibodies to DNA show localized binding to these microstructures, which also react positively with DNA intercalating stains propidium iodide (PI) and 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI). Each antibody binds dinosaur cells in patterns similar to extant cells. These data are the first to support preservation of multiple proteins and to present multiple lines of evidence for material consistent with DNA in dinosaurs, supporting the hypothesis that these structures were part of the once living animals. We propose mechanisms for preservation of cells and component molecules, and discuss implications for dinosaurian cellular biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 114 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Professor 7 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 30 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Chemistry 8 6%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 14 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#190,082
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from BONE
#9
of 4,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#948
of 193,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BONE
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,346 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.