↓ Skip to main content

Light therapy for non-seasonal depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
3 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Light therapy for non-seasonal depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004050.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arja Tuunainen, Daniel F Kripke, Takuro Endo

Abstract

Efficacy of light therapy for non-seasonal depression has been studied without any consensus on its efficacy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 165 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 40 23%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 32%
Psychology 32 18%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 28 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#535,017
of 14,346,625 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,559
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,541
of 250,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 507 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,346,625 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 507 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.