You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Consensus disease definitions for neurologic immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1136/jitc-2021-002890 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amanda C Guidon, Leeann B Burton, Bart K Chwalisz, James Hillis, Teilo H Schaller, Anthony A Amato, Allison Betof Warner, Priscilla K Brastianos, Tracey A Cho, Stacey L Clardy, Justine V Cohen, Jorg Dietrich, Michael Dougan, Christopher T Doughty, Divyanshu Dubey, Jeffrey M Gelfand, Jeffrey T Guptill, Douglas B Johnson, Vern C Juel, Robert Kadish, Noah Kolb, Nicole R LeBoeuf, Jenny Linnoila, Andrew L Mammen, Maria Martinez-Lage, Meghan J Mooradian, Jarushka Naidoo, Tomas G Neilan, David A Reardon, Krista M Rubin, Bianca D Santomasso, Ryan J Sullivan, Nancy Wang, Karin Woodman, Leyre Zubiri, William C Louv, Kerry L Reynolds |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 22 | 51% |
Spain | 3 | 7% |
Italy | 3 | 7% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 56% |
Scientists | 11 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 12 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Researcher | 7 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 11% |
Unknown | 55 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 56 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#392,006
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#82
of 3,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,435
of 448,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#5
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.