You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Data synthesis and adversarial networks: A review and meta-analysis in cancer imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Image Analysis, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.media.2022.102704 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Osuala, Kaisar Kushibar, Lidia Garrucho, Akis Linardos, Zuzanna Szafranowska, Stefan Klein, Ben Glocker, Oliver Diaz, Karim Lekadir |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 26 | 35% |
| Librarian | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 26 | 35% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,811,101
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Medical Image Analysis
#97
of 1,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,792
of 436,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Image Analysis
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.