You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Scarcity of resources and inequity in access are frequently reported ethical issues for physiotherapists internationally: an observational study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00663-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Caroline Fryer, Andrea Sturm, Roswith Roth, Ian Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 20% |
Taiwan | 2 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Saint Lucia | 1 | 7% |
Austria | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
Scientists | 6 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,092,965
of 25,365,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#322
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,535
of 431,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#12
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,365,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.