↓ Skip to main content

Systematic evaluation of gig work against decent work standards: The development and application of the Fairwork framework

Overview of attention for article published in The Information Society, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 365)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic evaluation of gig work against decent work standards: The development and application of the Fairwork framework
Published in
The Information Society, July 2021
DOI 10.1080/01972243.2021.1942356
Authors

Richard Heeks, Mark Graham, Paul Mungai, Jean-Paul Van Belle, Jamie Woodcock

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 19 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 19 24%
Social Sciences 11 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 11%
Arts and Humanities 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 26 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,192,388
of 20,952,692 outputs
Outputs from The Information Society
#28
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,843
of 341,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Information Society
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,952,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.