↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005595.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin CW, Donkers NA, Refshauge KM, Beckenkamp PR, Khera K, Moseley AM, Lin, Chung-Wei Christine, Donkers, Nicole AJ, Refshauge, Kathryn M, Beckenkamp, Paula R, Khera, Kriti, Moseley, Anne M

Abstract

Rehabilitation after ankle fracture can begin soon after the fracture has been treated, either surgically or non-surgically, by the use of different types of immobilisation that allow early commencement of weight-bearing or exercise. Alternatively, rehabilitation, including the use of physical or manual therapies, may start following the period of immobilisation. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2008.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 256 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 20%
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Postgraduate 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 10%
Other 66 25%
Unknown 25 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 40 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,538,145
of 12,813,106 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,248
of 10,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,346
of 251,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#246
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,813,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.