You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“I don’t have the heart”: a qualitative study of barriers to and facilitators of physical activity for people with coronary heart disease and depressive symptoms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-9-140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle C Rogerson, Barbara M Murphy, Stephen Bird, Tony Morris |
| Abstract |
Physical activity has been shown to reduce depression in people with coronary heart disease (CHD), however many people with CHD do not engage in sufficient levels of physical activity to reap its positive effects. People with depression and CHD are at particular risk of non-adherence to physical activity. Little is known about the barriers to and facilitators of physical activity for people with CHD and depressive symptoms. Using qualitative interviews, the aim of this study was to explore the barriers to and facilitators of physical activity for cardiac patients with depressive symptoms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Norway | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 18% |
| Psychology | 29 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 46 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#5,226,703
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,369
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,686
of 285,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#21
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.