You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for the prevention of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013877.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katie E Webster, Lisa O'Byrne, Samuel MacKeith, Carl Philpott, Claire Hopkins, Martin J Burton |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 23% |
| Japan | 5 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Iceland | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 58 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 65 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,107,764
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,369
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,273
of 427,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.