↓ Skip to main content

Estimating Central Equatorial Pacific SST Variability over the Past Millennium. Part II: Reconstructions and Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Climate, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Estimating Central Equatorial Pacific SST Variability over the Past Millennium. Part II: Reconstructions and Implications
Published in
Journal of Climate, April 2013
DOI 10.1175/jcli-d-11-00511.1
Authors

Julien Emile-Geay, Kimberly M. Cobb, Michael E. Mann, Andrew T. Wittenberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 114 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Researcher 27 22%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 67 54%
Environmental Science 21 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 25 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,357,747
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Climate
#1,551
of 7,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,684
of 200,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Climate
#40
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.