↓ Skip to main content

Factors determining the occurrence of submicroscopic malaria infections and their relevance for control

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
497 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors determining the occurrence of submicroscopic malaria infections and their relevance for control
Published in
Nature Communications, December 2012
DOI 10.1038/ncomms2241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy C. Okell, Teun Bousema, Jamie T. Griffin, André Lin Ouédraogo, Azra C. Ghani, Chris J. Drakeley

Abstract

Malaria parasite prevalence in endemic populations is an essential indicator for monitoring the progress of malaria control, and has traditionally been assessed by microscopy. However, surveys increasingly use sensitive molecular methods that detect higher numbers of infected individuals, questioning our understanding of the true infection burden and resources required to reduce it. Here we analyse a series of data sets to characterize the distribution and epidemiological factors associated with low-density, submicroscopic infections. We show that submicroscopic parasite carriage is common in adults, in low-endemic settings and in chronic infections. We find a strong, non-linear relationship between microscopy and PCR prevalence in population surveys (n=106), and provide a tool to relate these measures. When transmission reaches very low levels, submicroscopic carriers are estimated to be the source of 20-50% of all human-to-mosquito transmissions. Our findings challenge the idea that individuals with little previous malaria exposure have insufficient immunity to control parasitaemia and suggest a role for molecular screening.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 427 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 91 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 18%
Student > Master 73 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Other 20 5%
Other 66 15%
Unknown 82 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 80 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 25 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 3%
Other 68 15%
Unknown 105 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,504,252
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#34,751
of 52,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,184
of 287,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#93
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.