↓ Skip to main content

Decision-support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
41 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision-support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012944.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Smisha Agarwal, Claire Glenton, Tigest Tamrat, Nicholas Henschke, Nicola Maayan, Marita S Fønhus, Garrett L Mehl, Simon Lewin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 16%
Unspecified 18 13%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 45 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Unspecified 15 11%
Computer Science 10 7%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 50 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,376,759
of 20,975,194 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,289
of 12,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,808
of 339,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,975,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.