| Title |
Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2196/26759 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arlinda Ruco, Fahima Dossa, Jill Tinmouth, Diego Llovet, Jenna Jacobson, Teruko Kishibe, Nancy Baxter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 46 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,935,288
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#4,286
of 7,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,659
of 441,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#130
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.