↓ Skip to main content

Experimental evaluation of spatial capture–recapture study design

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental evaluation of spatial capture–recapture study design
Published in
Ecological Applications, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/eap.2419
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill Fleming, Evan H. Campbell Grant, Sean C. Sterrett, Chris Sutherland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 60%
Environmental Science 3 30%
Mathematics 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,024,617
of 19,194,973 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#287
of 2,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,324
of 332,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#16
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,194,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.