You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ドン・マーキスの反妊娠中絶論とその批判
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.24504/itetsu.28.0_19 |
| Authors |
江口 聡 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Liechtenstein | 1 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,854,022
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine
#6
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,981
of 103,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them