↓ Skip to main content

Accelerated RNA detection using tandem CRISPR nucleases

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemical Biology, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 2,801)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
301 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accelerated RNA detection using tandem CRISPR nucleases
Published in
Nature Chemical Biology, August 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41589-021-00842-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tina Y. Liu, Gavin J. Knott, Dylan C. J. Smock, John J. Desmarais, Sungmin Son, Abdul Bhuiya, Shrutee Jakhanwal, Noam Prywes, Shreeya Agrawal, María Díaz de León Derby, Neil A. Switz, Maxim Armstrong, Andrew R. Harris, Emeric J. Charles, Brittney W. Thornton, Parinaz Fozouni, Jeffrey Shu, Stephanie I. Stephens, G. Renuka Kumar, Chunyu Zhao, Amanda Mok, Anthony T. Iavarone, Arturo M. Escajeda, Roger McIntosh, Shineui Kim, Eli J. Dugan, Jennifer R. Hamilton, Enrique Lin-Shiao, Elizabeth C. Stahl, Connor A. Tsuchida, Erica A. Moehle, Petros Giannikopoulos, Matthew McElroy, Shana McDevitt, Arielle Zur, Iman Sylvain, Alison Ciling, Madeleine Zhu, Clara Williams, Alisha Baldwin, Katherine S. Pollard, Ming X. Tan, Melanie Ott, Daniel A. Fletcher, Liana F. Lareau, Patrick D. Hsu, David F. Savage, Jennifer A. Doudna

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 301 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Chemistry 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 26 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 341. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#59,975
of 19,476,606 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemical Biology
#9
of 2,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,984
of 335,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemical Biology
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,476,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.