You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurofeedback to improve neurocognitive functioning of children treated for a brain tumor: design of a randomized controlled double-blind trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-581 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marieke A de Ruiter, Antoinette YN Schouten-Van Meeteren, Rosa van Mourik, Tieme WP Janssen, Juliette EM Greidanus, Jaap Oosterlaan, Martha A Grootenhuis |
| Abstract |
Neurotoxicity caused by treatment for a brain tumor is a major cause of neurocognitive decline in survivors. Studies have shown that neurofeedback may enhance neurocognitive functioning. This paper describes the protocol of the PRISMA study, a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of neurofeedback to improve neurocognitive functioning in children treated for a brain tumor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 56 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,245,903
of 24,849,927 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,368
of 8,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,894
of 289,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#19
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,849,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.