↓ Skip to main content

History of Dorsum Conservative Techniques in Rhinoplasty: The Evolution of a Revived Technique

Overview of attention for article published in Facial Plastic Surgery, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
History of Dorsum Conservative Techniques in Rhinoplasty: The Evolution of a Revived Technique
Published in
Facial Plastic Surgery, February 2021
DOI 10.1055/s-0041-1724031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Arancibia-Tagle, José Carlos Neves, Alwyn D'Souza

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,551,922
of 18,890,258 outputs
Outputs from Facial Plastic Surgery
#161
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,752
of 299,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Facial Plastic Surgery
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,890,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.