↓ Skip to main content

Low nutrient intake among adult women and patients with severe tuberculosis disease in Uganda: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low nutrient intake among adult women and patients with severe tuberculosis disease in Uganda: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ezekiel Mupere, Isabel M Parraga, Daniel J Tisch, Harriet K Mayanja, Christopher C Whalen

Abstract

Information regarding dietary nutrient intake during tuberculosis disease is lacking. We established the relationship between disease severity or wasting during pulmonary tuberculosis and nutrient intake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 28 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2012.
All research outputs
#18,323,689
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,769
of 14,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,595
of 277,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#259
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.