You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Researching, co-creating and testing innovations in paper-based health information systems (PHISICC) to support health workers’ decision-making: protocol of a multi-country, transdisciplinary, mixed-methods research programme in three sub-Saharan countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-021-00768-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xavier Bosch-Capblanch, David O’Donnell, L. Kendall Krause, Christian Auer, Angela Oyo-Ita, Mamadou Samba, Graça Matsinhe, Abdullahi Bulama Garba, Damaris Rodríguez, Meike Zuske, Anthonia Ngozi Njepuome, Sofia Micael Mandjate Lee, Amanda Ross, Suzanne Gajewski, Artur Manuel Muloliwa, Richard B. Yapi, David W. Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#12,928,513
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#920
of 1,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,531
of 431,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.