↓ Skip to main content

Prompts to encourage appointment attendance for people with serious mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prompts to encourage appointment attendance for people with serious mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sawsan Reda, Matthew Rowett, Samer Makhoul

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 22%
Psychology 19 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,687,531
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,232
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,963
of 42,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.