↓ Skip to main content

Pilates for low‐back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pilates for low‐back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010265
Authors

Leonardo OP Costa, Mark Hancock, Christopher G. Maher, Raymond WJG Ostelo, Cristina MN Cabral, Luciola daC Menezes Costa, Costa, Leonardo OP, Hancock, Mark, Maher, Christopher G., Ostelo, Raymond WJG, Cabral, Cristina MN, Menezes Costa, Luciola daC

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
South Africa 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 24%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 29%
Sports and Recreations 2 10%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2017.
All research outputs
#926,072
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,720
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,789
of 288,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.