↓ Skip to main content

Natural experiments and long-term monitoring are critical to understand and predict marine host–microbe ecology and evolution

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
86 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural experiments and long-term monitoring are critical to understand and predict marine host–microbe ecology and evolution
Published in
PLoS Biology, August 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthieu Leray, Laetitia G. E. Wilkins, Amy Apprill, Holly M. Bik, Friederike Clever, Sean R. Connolly, Marina E. De León, J. Emmett Duffy, Leïla Ezzat, Sarah Gignoux-Wolfsohn, Edward Allen Herre, Jonathan Z. Kaye, David I. Kline, Jordan G. Kueneman, Melissa K. McCormick, W. Owen McMillan, Aaron O’Dea, Tiago J. Pereira, Jillian M. Petersen, Daniel F. Petticord, Mark E. Torchin, Rebecca Vega Thurber, Elin Videvall, William T. Wcislo, Benedict Yuen, Jonathan A. Eisen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#448,897
of 19,602,522 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#965
of 5,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,559
of 335,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,602,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.