↓ Skip to main content

Improving diagnostic performance through feedback: the Diagnosis Learning Cycle

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
63 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving diagnostic performance through feedback: the Diagnosis Learning Cycle
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, August 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012456
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Fernandez Branson, Michelle Williams, Teresa M Chan, Mark L Graber, Kathleen P Lane, Skip Grieser, Zach Landis-Lewis, James Cooke, Divvy K Upadhyay, Shawn Mondoux, Hardeep Singh, Laura Zwaan, Charles Friedman, Andrew P J Olson

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 12%
Lecturer 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 35%
Unspecified 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,138,899
of 26,187,546 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#433
of 2,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,587
of 442,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,187,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.