You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antibody detection in breast milk from a prospective multicentre study in Spain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322463 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christine Bäuerl, Walter Randazzo, Gloria Sánchez, Marta Selma-Royo, Elia García Verdevio, Laura Martínez, Anna Parra-Llorca, Carles Lerin, Victoria Fumadó, Francesca Crovetto, Fatima Crispi, Francisco J Pérez-Cano, Gerardo Rodríguez, Gemma Ruiz-Redondo, Cristina Campoy, Cecilia Martínez-Costa, Maria Carmen Collado, Elena Crehuá-Gaudiza, Javier Estañ-Capell, Asuncion Obiol, Reyes Balanza, Álvaro Solaz-García, Inmaculada Lara-Cantón, Cristina Garcia, María Ríos Barnés, Sara Ruiz, Marta Fabre, Federico García-García, Maria José Rodríguez-Lagunas, Karla Río-Aigé |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,913 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 957 | 33% |
United States | 40 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 26 | <1% |
Germany | 18 | <1% |
Morocco | 17 | <1% |
Indonesia | 11 | <1% |
Canada | 11 | <1% |
Japan | 9 | <1% |
France | 8 | <1% |
Other | 122 | 4% |
Unknown | 1694 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2852 | 98% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 39 | 1% |
Scientists | 17 | <1% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 52 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 51 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#121,178
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#5
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,497
of 439,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.