You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whispering dysphonia (DYT4 dystonia) is caused by a mutation in the TUBB4 gene
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Neurology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ana.23829 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katja Lohmann, Robert A. Wilcox, Susen Winkler, Alfredo Ramirez, Aleksandar Rakovic, Jin‐Sung Park, Björn Arns, Thora Lohnau, Justus Groen, Meike Kasten, Norbert Brüggemann, Johann Hagenah, Alexander Schmidt, Frank J. Kaiser, Kishore R. Kumar, Katja Zschiedrich, Daniel Alvarez‐Fischer, Eckart Altenmüller, Andreas Ferbert, Anthony E. Lang, Alexander Münchau, Vladimir Kostic, Kristina Simonyan, Marc Agzarian, Laurie J. Ozelius, Antonius P. M. Langeveld, Carolyn M. Sue, Marina A. J. Tijssen, Christine Klein |
| Abstract |
A study was undertaken to identify the gene underlying DYT4 dystonia, a dominantly inherited form of spasmodic dysphonia combined with other focal or generalized dystonia and a characteristic facies and body habitus, in an Australian family. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Chile | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,384,442
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#2,300
of 5,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,451
of 203,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#19
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.