↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for actinic keratoses

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for actinic keratoses
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004415.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aditya K Gupta, Maryse Paquet, Elmer Villanueva, William Brintnell

Abstract

Actinic keratoses are a skin disease caused by long-term sun exposure, and their lesions have the potential to develop into squamous cell carcinoma. Treatments for actinic keratoses are sought for cosmetic reasons, for the relief of associated symptoms, or for the prevention of skin cancer development. Detectable lesions are often associated with alteration of the surrounding skin (field) where subclinical lesions might be present. The interventions available for the treatment of actinic keratoses include individual lesion-based (e.g. cryotherapy) or field-directed (e.g. topical) treatments. These might vary in terms of efficacy, safety, and cosmetic outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 288 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 20%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Other 59 20%
Unknown 47 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 63 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,206,141
of 14,064,191 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,536
of 10,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,735
of 249,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#201
of 499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,064,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.