↓ Skip to main content

Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
25 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006968.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blánaid Daly, Mohammad O Sharif, Tim Newton, Kate Jones, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

Alveolar osteitis (dry socket) is a complication of dental extractions and occurs more commonly in extractions involving mandibular molar teeth. It is associated with severe pain developing 2 to 3 days postoperatively, a socket that may be partially or totally devoid of blood clot and in some patients there may be a complaint of halitosis. It can result in an increase in postoperative visits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 358 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 19%
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Postgraduate 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 106 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 190 53%
Psychology 13 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 26 7%
Unknown 109 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,230,808
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,599
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,846
of 286,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.