You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High aboveground carbon stock of African tropical montane forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03728-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aida Cuni-Sanchez, Martin J. P. Sullivan, Philip J. Platts, Simon L. Lewis, Rob Marchant, Gérard Imani, Wannes Hubau, Iveren Abiem, Hari Adhikari, Tomas Albrecht, Jan Altman, Christian Amani, Abreham B. Aneseyee, Valerio Avitabile, Lindsay Banin, Rodrigue Batumike, Marijn Bauters, Hans Beeckman, Serge K. Begne, Amy C. Bennett, Robert Bitariho, Pascal Boeckx, Jan Bogaert, Achim Bräuning, Franklin Bulonvu, Neil D. Burgess, Kim Calders, Colin Chapman, Hazel Chapman, James Comiskey, Thales de Haulleville, Mathieu Decuyper, Ben DeVries, Jiri Dolezal, Vincent Droissart, Corneille Ewango, Senbeta Feyera, Aster Gebrekirstos, Roy Gereau, Martin Gilpin, Dismas Hakizimana, Jefferson Hall, Alan Hamilton, Olivier Hardy, Terese Hart, Janne Heiskanen, Andreas Hemp, Martin Herold, Ulrike Hiltner, David Horak, Marie-Noel Kamdem, Charles Kayijamahe, David Kenfack, Mwangi J. Kinyanjui, Julia Klein, Janvier Lisingo, Jon Lovett, Mark Lung, Jean-Remy Makana, Yadvinder Malhi, Andrew Marshall, Emanuel H. Martin, Edward T. A. Mitchard, Alexandra Morel, John T. Mukendi, Tom Muller, Felix Nchu, Brigitte Nyirambangutse, Joseph Okello, Kelvin S.-H. Peh, Petri Pellikka, Oliver L. Phillips, Andrew Plumptre, Lan Qie, Francesco Rovero, Moses N. Sainge, Christine B. Schmitt, Ondrej Sedlacek, Alain S. K. Ngute, Douglas Sheil, Demisse Sheleme, Tibebu Y. Simegn, Murielle Simo-Droissart, Bonaventure Sonké, Teshome Soromessa, Terry Sunderland, Miroslav Svoboda, Hermann Taedoumg, James Taplin, David Taylor, Sean C. Thomas, Jonathan Timberlake, Darlington Tuagben, Peter Umunay, Eustrate Uzabaho, Hans Verbeeck, Jason Vleminckx, Göran Wallin, Charlotte Wheeler, Simon Willcock, John T. Woods, Etienne Zibera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 244 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 43 | 18% |
| United States | 17 | 7% |
| Rwanda | 17 | 7% |
| Belgium | 6 | 2% |
| Sweden | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| South Africa | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 112 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 175 | 72% |
| Scientists | 61 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 259 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 74 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 97 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 553. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#44,288
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,764
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,502
of 437,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#113
of 935 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 935 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.