↓ Skip to main content

Anticholinergic drugs versus non-drug active therapies for non-neurogenic overactive bladder syndrome in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anticholinergic drugs versus non-drug active therapies for non-neurogenic overactive bladder syndrome in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003193.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhavan Prasad Rai, June D Cody, Ammar Alhasso, Laurence Stewart

Abstract

Overactive bladder syndrome is defined as urgency with or without urgency incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia. Pharmacotherapy with anticholinergic drugs is often the first line medical therapy, either alone or as an adjunct to various non-pharmacological therapies after conservative options such as reducing intake of caffeine drinks have been tried. Non-pharmacologic therapies consist of bladder training, pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback, behavioural modification, electrical stimulation and surgical interventions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Other 25 14%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Other 47 25%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 36 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,589,023
of 14,185,573 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,427
of 10,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,819
of 249,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#284
of 499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,185,573 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.