↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional supplementation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional supplementation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000998.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivone M Ferreira, Dina Brooks, John White, Roger Goldstein

Abstract

Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and low body weight have impaired pulmonary status, reduced diaphragmatic mass, lower exercise capacity and higher mortality than those who are adequately nourished. Nutritional support may be useful for their comprehensive care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 371 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 92 24%
Student > Bachelor 49 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Researcher 32 8%
Other 25 7%
Other 84 22%
Unknown 64 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 157 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 16%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Sports and Recreations 10 3%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 82 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,570,123
of 18,990,581 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,784
of 11,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,952
of 272,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#182
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,990,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.