↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional supplementation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
502 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional supplementation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000998.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivone M Ferreira, Dina Brooks, John White, Roger Goldstein

Abstract

Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and low body weight have impaired pulmonary status, reduced diaphragmatic mass, lower exercise capacity and higher mortality than those who are adequately nourished. Nutritional support may be useful for their comprehensive care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 494 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 20%
Student > Bachelor 61 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 8%
Researcher 37 7%
Other 29 6%
Other 98 20%
Unknown 138 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 173 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 14%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Sports and Recreations 11 2%
Other 54 11%
Unknown 160 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,691,725
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,605
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,457
of 286,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.