You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.n1931 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Hippisley-Cox, Martina Patone, Xue W Mei, Defne Saatci, Sharon Dixon, Kamlesh Khunti, Francesco Zaccardi, Peter Watkinson, Manu Shankar-Hari, James Doidge, David A Harrison, Simon J Griffin, Aziz Sheikh, Carol A C Coupland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,595 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 348 | 8% |
| United States | 200 | 4% |
| Japan | 151 | 3% |
| France | 123 | 3% |
| Spain | 110 | 2% |
| Italy | 98 | 2% |
| Germany | 86 | 2% |
| Chile | 80 | 2% |
| Australia | 72 | 2% |
| Other | 761 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2566 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4067 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 239 | 5% |
| Scientists | 232 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 53 | 1% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 333 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 11% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 16% |
| Unknown | 140 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 14% |
| Unknown | 151 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5778. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#605
of 24,963,265 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#16
of 64,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33
of 423,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 684 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,963,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 684 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.