You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing training and opportunities for students in systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Education, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/medu.14649 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juliet A. Usher‐Smith, Hannah Harrison, Rebecca Dennison, Sarah Kelly, Rebecca Jones, Isla Kuhn, Simon J. Griffin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 56% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 28% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 20% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,999,976
of 25,233,554 outputs
Outputs from Medical Education
#333
of 3,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,275
of 423,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Education
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,233,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.