You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Paleoceanography and dinoflagellate cyst stratigraphy across the Lower–Middle Pleistocene Subseries (Calabrian–Chibanian Stage) boundary at the Chiba composite section, Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40645-021-00438-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eseroghene J. Balota, Martin J. Head, Makoto Okada, Yusuke Suganuma, Yuki Haneda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 8 | 53% |
China | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 15% |
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 23% |
Unspecified | 2 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,212,434
of 25,016,456 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#83
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,622
of 422,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,016,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.