↓ Skip to main content

Early use of inhaled corticosteroids in the emergency department treatment of acute asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early use of inhaled corticosteroids in the emergency department treatment of acute asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002308.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcia L Edmonds, Stephen J Milan, Carlos A Camargo Jr, Charles V Pollack, Brian H Rowe

Abstract

Systemic corticosteroid therapy is central to the management of acute asthma. The use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may also be beneficial in this setting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 227 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Other 21 9%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 53 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,049,945
of 13,750,423 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,173
of 10,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,251
of 248,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#183
of 502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,750,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.