↓ Skip to main content

Estimated US Infection- and Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Based on Blood Donations, July 2020-May 2021

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimated US Infection- and Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Based on Blood Donations, July 2020-May 2021
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2021
DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.15161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jefferson M. Jones, Mars Stone, Hasan Sulaeman, Rebecca V. Fink, Honey Dave, Matthew E. Levy, Clara Di Germanio, Valerie Green, Edward Notari, Paula Saa, Brad J. Biggerstaff, Donna Strauss, Debra Kessler, Ralph Vassallo, Rita Reik, Susan Rossmann, Mark Destree, Kim-Anh Nguyen, Merlyn Sayers, Chris Lough, Daniel W. Bougie, Megan Ritter, Gerardo Latoni, Billy Weales, Stacy Sime, Jed Gorlin, Nicole E. Brown, Carolyn V. Gould, Kevin Berney, Tina J. Benoit, Maureen J. Miller, Dane Freeman, Deeksha Kartik, Alicia M. Fry, Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, Aron J. Hall, Adam MacNeil, Adi V. Gundlapalli, Sridhar V. Basavaraju, Susan I. Gerber, Monica E. Patton, Brian Custer, Phillip Williamson, Graham Simmons, Natalie J. Thornburg, Steven Kleinman, Susan L. Stramer, Jean Opsomer, Michael P. Busch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,288 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 14%
Other 13 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor 6 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 48 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 53 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1946. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,987
of 25,947,988 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#157
of 36,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220
of 441,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#6
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,947,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.