Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 2 news outlets
blogs: 9 blogs
twitter: 63 X users

peer_reviews: 1 peer review site
facebook: 1 Facebook page
wikipedia: 1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation: 243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 200 Mendeley
citeulike: 3 CiteULike

Summary News Blogs X Peer reviews Facebook Wikipedia Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 78 X posts from 63 X users, with an upper bound of 921,406 followers.

The value of Peer review needs to be reviewed ! #MedTwitter https://t.co/CafZUms4ci

14 Nov 2022

Reply Repost Favourite

It’s out of date, but this a good starting place. https://t.co/9cWdpR8BDL It’s a pretty low bar to clear if a review process only has to not make something not-worse.

20 Sep 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies - PubMed https://t.co/tCgQK3t7te via @instapaper

08 Jul 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @CochraneJapan: 生物医学研究の報告の質を向上させるための査読 https://t.co/pBx35WMgAi

21 Aug 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 74 additional X posts.