↓ Skip to main content

Direct and indirect measurement of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct and indirect measurement of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of the literature
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina Kowalski, Ryan Rhodes, Patti-Jean Naylor, Holly Tuokko, Stuart MacDonald

Abstract

Due to physiological and cognitive changes that occur with aging, accurate physical activity (PA) measurement in older adults represents a unique challenge. The primary purpose of this study was to systematically review measures of PA and their use and appropriateness with older adults. A secondary aim was to determine the level of agreement between PA measures in older adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Algeria 1 <1%
Unknown 305 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 16%
Student > Master 46 15%
Student > Bachelor 45 14%
Researcher 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 65 21%
Unknown 61 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 21%
Sports and Recreations 49 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 11%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Psychology 18 6%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 80 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2012.
All research outputs
#4,401,813
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,240
of 1,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,042
of 280,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#51
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.