You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anti-rotaviral effects of Glycyrrhiza uralensis extract in piglets with rotavirus diarrhea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-422x-9-310 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mia Madel Alfajaro, Hyun-Jeong Kim, Jun-Gyu Park, Eun-Hye Ryu, Ji-Yun Kim, Young-Ju Jeong, Deok-Song Kim, Myra Hosmillo, Kyu-Yeol Son, Ju-Hwan Lee, Hyung-Jun Kwon, Young Bae Ryu, Su-Jin Park, Sang-Ik Park, Woo Song Lee, Kyoung-Oh Cho |
| Abstract |
Since rotavirus is one of the leading pathogens that cause severe gastroenteritis and represents a serious threat to human and animal health, researchers have been searching for cheap, safe, and effective anti-rotaviral drugs. There is a widespread of interest in using natural products as antiviral agents, and among them, licorice derived from Glycyrrhiza spp. has exerted antiviral properties against several viruses. In this study, anti-rotaviral efficacy of Glycyrrhiza uralensis extract (GUE) as an effective and cheaper remedy without side-effects was evaluated in colostrums-deprived piglets after induction of rotavirus diarrhea. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,158,070
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,596
of 3,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,351
of 280,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#46
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.