↓ Skip to main content

The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Human Behaviour, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,130)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
63 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
2862 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
6 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers
Published in
Nature Human Behaviour, September 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Longqi Yang, David Holtz, Sonia Jaffe, Siddharth Suri, Shilpi Sinha, Jeffrey Weston, Connor Joyce, Neha Shah, Kevin Sherman, Brent Hecht, Jaime Teevan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,862 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 17%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Computer Science 9 8%
Engineering 8 7%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 24 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2492. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,889
of 19,224,001 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#6
of 1,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146
of 324,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#1
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,224,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 151.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.