↓ Skip to main content

General methodological aspects in the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019): a population-based household survey

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
General methodological aspects in the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019): a population-based household survey
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, January 2021
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00300020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadya Helena Alves-Santos, Inês Rugani Ribeiro de Castro, Luiz Antonio dos Anjos, Elisa Maria de Aquino Lacerda, Paula Normando, Maiara Brusco de Freitas, Dayana Rodrigues Farias, Cristiano Siqueira Boccolini, Maurício Teixeira Leite de Vasconcellos, Pedro Luis do Nascimento Silva, Gilberto Kac

Abstract

This article aims to present general methodological aspects of the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019), from the conception of the study design to details of the data collection. This is a household-based population survey with a sample calculated at 15,000 households to identify children under five years of age, conducted in 123 municipalities in Brazil's 26 states and the Federal District. ENANI-2019 includes data on breastfeeding and dietary intake; anthropometric nutritional status of all children and their biological mothers; and nutritional status concerning the following micronutrients: iron (hemoglobin and ferritin), zinc, selenium, and vitamins A, B1, B6, B12, D, E, and folic acid of children from 6 to 59 months of age. A total of 193,212 households were visited, of which 19,951 were eligible, and 12,524 were included in the study. A total of 14,558 children were studied, of whom 13,990 (96.1%) and 13,921 (95.6%) had their body mass and length/stature measured, respectively, and 14,541 (99.9%) underwent 24-hour dietary recalls (24HR). Of the 12,598 children eligible for blood sample collection, 8,739 (69.3%) had at least one laboratory parameter measured. Data were collected from February 2019 to March 2020, when the survey was interrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The evidence produced by the ENANI-2019 survey can back the formulation, follow-up, and/or reorientation of food and nutrition policies such as the promotion of breastfeeding and healthy eating and the prevention and control of different forms of malnutrition.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Unknown 9 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 8 53%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#17,769,834
of 20,040,745 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#344
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,039
of 340,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,040,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them