↓ Skip to main content

Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-604
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximino Redondo, Rafael Funez, Francisco Medina-Cano, Isabel Rodrigo, Mercedes Acebal, Teresa Tellez, M Jose Roldan, M Luisa Hortas, Ana Bellinvia, Teresa Pereda, Laia Domingo, María Morales-Suarez Varela, Maria Sala, Antonio Rueda

Abstract

The aim of this study was to measure the biological characteristics involved in tumorigenesis and the progression of breast cancer in symptomatic and screen-detected carcinomas to identify possible differences.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 7%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 8 30%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Computer Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2012.
All research outputs
#1,637,989
of 3,626,860 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#646
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,212
of 277,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#35
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,626,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 53rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.