↓ Skip to main content

Exercise therapy for bone and muscle health: an overview of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise therapy for bone and muscle health: an overview of systematic reviews
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kåre Birger Hagen, Hanne Dagfinrud, Rikke Helene Moe, Nina Østerås, Ingvild Kjeken, Margreth Grotle, Geir Smedslund

Abstract

Musculoskeletal conditions (MSCs) are widely prevalent in present-day society, with resultant high healthcare costs and substantial negative effects on patient health and quality of life. The main aim of this overview was to synthesize evidence from systematic reviews on the effects of exercise therapy (ET) on pain and physical function for patients with MSCs. In addition, the evidence for the effect of ET on disease pathogenesis, and whether particular components of exercise programs are associated with the size of the treatment effects, was also explored.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 270 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 18%
Student > Bachelor 47 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Other 65 23%
Unknown 43 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 15%
Sports and Recreations 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 63 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#665,721
of 15,924,754 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#521
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,759
of 261,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#30
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,924,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.