You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determinants of acceptance of cervical cancer screening in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1093 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Crispin Kahesa, Susanne Kjaer, Julius Mwaiselage, Twalib Ngoma, Britt Tersbol, Myassa Dartell, Vibeke Rasch |
| Abstract |
To describe how demographic characteristics and knowledge of cervical cancer influence screening acceptance among women living in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 292 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 75 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 81 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 91 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,759,078
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,067
of 15,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,724
of 284,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#69
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.