You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non‐pharmacological measures implemented in the setting of long‐term care facilities to prevent SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and their consequences: a rapid review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015085.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan M Stratil, Renke L Biallas, Jacob Burns, Laura Arnold, Karin Geffert, Angela M Kunzler, Ina Monsef, Julia Stadelmaier, Katharina Wabnitz, Tim Litwin, Clemens Kreutz, Anna Helen Boger, Saskia Lindner, Ben Verboom, Stephan Voss, Ani Movsisyan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 13% |
| Germany | 9 | 9% |
| Spain | 6 | 6% |
| Japan | 5 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 12% |
| Scientists | 8 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 243 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 115 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 130 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#513,783
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#900
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,580
of 435,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.