The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Integrating socioecological suitability with human–wildlife conflict risk: Case study for translocation of a large ungulate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.14021 |
Authors |
Nicholas P. McCann, Eric M. Walberg, James D. Forester, Michael W. Schrage, David C. Fulton, Mark A. Ditmer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 33% |
Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 6 | 50% |
Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 8 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,096,588
of 24,641,620 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,176
of 3,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,792
of 425,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#59
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.